Page 1
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
189
Section Five: Administrative requirements
Websuche.info die frische Suchmaschine alteredrealitycc derkach private Krankenversicherung Autoversicherung KFZ Versicherung Lebensversicherung KFZ Versicherungsvergleich Autoversicherungen KFZ Versicherungen Lebensversicherungen Horoskop Horoskope Eintrag bbsnet Reisen Urlaub Baufinanzierung Hausfinanzierung Immobilienfinanzierung Erotik Hallenbau creative-lizzy Last Minute Algarve Ferienhaus Portugal Werbemittel Werbeartikel Viking Buerobedarf Bueroartikel Bueromaterial Kalender Drucker Druckerpatronen Tintenpatronen HP Drucker Werbeartikel Werbemittel Bueromoebel Kopierer Krankenversicherungsvergleich Werbeartikel Werbemittel Kreditvergleich
tableofcontents.htm   start.htm   securitysectiontwo.htm   securitysectionthree.htm   securitysectionone.htm   securitycategories.htm   references.htm   privacysectiontwo.htm   privacysectionthree.htm   privacysectionone.htm   privacysectionfour.htm   privacysectionfive.htm   privacycategories.htm   jobdescriptions.htm   introduction.htm   index.htm   hipaatrifold.htm   hipaasuppliment.htm   hipaaresources.htm   hipaaexecsummary.htm   guidelinesorganization.htm   generalpolicyguidelines.htm   generalcategories.htm   definitions.htm   contractsandpolicies.htm   contact.htm   amchipaasecurityandprivacyguidelines.htm   acronyms.htm   acknowledgements.htm  

Page 2
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
190
PRIV.48 Privacy
Official
§ 164.530(a)(1)(i)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: Personnel designation
A covered entity must designate a privacy official who is responsible for the
development and implementation of the policies and procedures of the entity...
...(2) Implementation specification:
A covered entity must document the personnel designations in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section as required by paragraph (j) of this section.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
The regulation requires the covered entity to appoint an individual to be accountable for the
development and implementation of privacy policies and procedures. It also requires that this
designation be documented.
Key Issues
What are the job responsibilities of the Privacy Official? Is the authority they have been
given commensurate with the role?
How will the Privacy Official's duties and resources integrate with related functions in
the covered entity?
What skills and knowledge base does this position require?
Will the privacy responsibilities be added to an existing position, or is this a new FTE?
What portion of an FTE should be allocated to this position, and how will requirements
change over time as the planning phase is supplanted by a long-term operational and
maintenance role?
What will be the relationship between the Information Security Officer and the Privacy
Official?
To whom will this position report within the covered entity?
Will the Privacy Official also be the contact person for complaints?
Will a separate Privacy Official be required for each covered entity's subsidiaries?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Select a single individual to serve as the privacy official for each covered entity.
Designate one privacy official for covered entities that consist of several subsidiaries
pursuant to § 164.504(b).
Maintain a written or electronic record of privacy official designation(s)
.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Create a job description for the privacy official defining the position's role,
responsibilities, and reporting relationship(s).
The privacy official:
Should work with a committee representing several different components of the
covered entity to develop and implement the privacy policy; and

Page 3
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
191
Should have a position on the institution's HIPAA Oversight Board.
Roadblocks
In most AMCs, many departments and individuals currently have the ability to draft and
implement policies on the use of protected health information. It might be difficult to get all
faculty and staff, across all health system entities, to follow the recommendations of the privacy
official.
If a covered entity has multiple privacy officials (its subsidiaries are each considered a "covered
entity" pursuant to § 164.504(b)), and the entity wishes to standardize privacy matters, it will
take a well-coordinated communication effort. From a marketing and customer service
standpoint, it may also be important for the covered entity to have a seamless approach to
privacy matters.
Comments
Not every covered entity will need to allocate a new position for the Privacy Official. Small
providers may wish to delegate these responsibilities to an existing employee, while large entities
may create a full-time position. How a covered entity chooses to designate the covered entities
under § 164.504(b) is key to deciding how many privacy officials to designate.
AMCs will likely have multiple people with security or privacy responsibilities. Consider how
the privacy official's work will be interdependent with those in supporting roles.
The role of Privacy Official will transition from one of program definition and development to
one of operational support and maintenance over a period of two to three years. If thoughtfully
and faithfully established, the role will fulfill requirements through functional reporting
relationships. The Privacy Official's authority and influence are critical; they must be adequate
to the task.

Page 4
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
192
PRIV.49
Privacy Contact Person or Office
§ 164.530(a)(1)(ii)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: Personnel designation...
...A covered entity must designate a contact person or office who is responsible
for receiving complaints under this section and who is able to provide further
information about matters covered by the notice required by
§ 164.520
.
(2) Implementation specification:
A covered entity must document the personnel designations in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section as required by paragraph (j) of this section.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
Each covered entity must designate a contact person or office responsible for receiving
complaints under the Privacy Standards and who can provide further information about the
covered entity's Privacy Notice. The designation must be documented, and a contact name must
be listed on the covered entity's Privacy Notice.
Key Issues
What are the job responsibilities of the contact person or office? What is the scope of the
position's authority within the covered entity?
What skills and knowledge base does this position require?
Will the privacy responsibilities be added to an existing position, or should a new
position be created?
What portion of a FTE should be allocated to this position?
What will be the relationship between the Information Security Officer, the Privacy
Official, and the contact person/office?
To whom will this position report to within the covered entity?
Will the Privacy Official also be the contact person for complaints? Will information be
consistently handled if the Privacy Official and contact person are not the same? Will
questions and incidents be consistently documented if the Privacy Official and the contact
person are not the same?
Is the mechanism for handling complaints a pre-existing mechanism, an adaptation of a
current system, or a new process?
Will the contact have access to management so that the right individual will hear
complaints with foundation?
Will a separate privacy contact be required for each of the covered entity's subsidiaries?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Designate an individual or an office to receive complaints and provide information about
matters covered by the covered entity's Notice of Privacy Practices (§ 164.520).
Add the contact information to the covered entity's Notice of Privacy Practices.
Maintain a written or electronic record of this personnel designation.

Page 5
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
193
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Establish a reporting structure and process to involve persons with appropriate authority
to investigate and track complaints.
Ensure that the process of responding to complaints is done in a way that is consistent
with good public relations practices as well as good privacy policy.
Consider adding the reporting responsibility to an existing function or office.
Roadblocks
If a covered entity has multiple privacy contacts (its subsidiaries are each considered a "covered
entity" pursuant to § 164.504(b)), and it wishes to standardize privacy matters, doing so will
require a well coordinated communication effort. Having a seamless approach to privacy matters
may be important for the covered entity from a marketing and customer service standpoint.
Provision of the appropriate level of authority to handle complaints will require a difficult to
achieve complex of relations among several units in an AMC (e.g., Risk Management,
Compliance Office, Communications, Counsel).
Comments
Not every covered entity will need to allocate a new position for the contact person. Smaller
providers may wish to delegate the responsibilities to an existing workforce member while larger
entities may create a full-time position. Depending on the size and nature of the covered entity,
the Privacy Officer could share this position.
Handling complaints from the public will likely require a specialized process.
References: § 164.512, Content of Notice and § 164.530(e), Sanctions.

Page 6
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
194
PRIV.50
Training on Privacy
§ 164.530(b)(1)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: training. A covered entity must train all members of its workforce to
carry out their function within the covered entity.
(2) Implementation specifications: training. (i) A covered entity must provide
training that meets the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, as
follows:
(A) To each member of the covered entity's workforce by no later than the
compliance date for the covered entity;
(B) Thereafter, to each new member of the workforce within a reasonable period
of time after the person joins the covered entity's workforce; and
(C) To each member of the covered entity's workforce whose functions are
affected by a material change in the policies or procedures required by this
subpart, within a reasonable period of time after the material change becomes
effective in accordance with paragraph (i) of this section.
(ii) A covered entity must document that the training as described in paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section has been provided, as required by paragraph (j) of this
section.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
The regulation requires training of all members of the covered entity's workforce in the covered
entity's policies and procedures with respect to protected health information. This includes
initial training at the time that the rule becomes applicable, with subsequent training of new
workforce members, and retraining as policy and/or procedure changes occur. All members of
the workforce must be trained, including employees, volunteers, trainees, and any others.
Finally, paragraph (j) requires that documentation of the training be kept in written or electronic
form for six years.
Key Issues
What are the criteria for judging training efficacy?
How can one determine the adequacy of effort by entities?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Train workforce members on privacy policy and procedure prior to the effective date of
the privacy regulations.
Thereafter, train new workforce members reasonably soon after they join the covered
entity.
When significant changes in policy and/or procedure occur, train the affected workforce
members as soon as possible after such changes.
Document the training in written or electronic form and retain the records for at least six
years.

Page 7
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
195
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Consider providing forms of training that help the trainee relate the policy to how they
are to behave in their working environment.
Consider including training on how to report a privacy problem.
Consider "refresher" courses and periodic reminders for workforce members about
privacy policy.
Consider competency tests to evaluate training effectiveness.
Roadblocks
No roadblocks specific to this point.
Comments
None.

Page 8
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
196
PRIV.51 Safeguards
§ 164.530(c)(1)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: safeguards. A covered entity must have in place appropriate
administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect the privacy of
protected health information.
(2) Implementation specification: safeguards. A covered entity must reasonably
safeguard protected health information from any intentional or unintentional use
or disclosure that is in violation of the standards, implementation specifications
or other requirements of this subpart.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
A covered entity must establish administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect
protected health information from unauthorized access or use. These safeguards must be
appropriate and reasonable.
A group health plan is excepted from coverage by § 164.530(c) in circumstances where it gets
limited amounts of protected health information under conditions described in § 164.530(k).
Key Issues
How should a covered entity handle the determination of what is reasonable and
appropriate?
Is implementing the (proposed) Security regulations an adequate way to address this
point in the privacy regulations?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
A covered entity must establish administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to
protect the privacy of protected health information from unauthorized use or disclosure.
These safeguards must be appropriate and reasonable.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Engage in a risk analysis (as the proposed Security regulations require) and create and
implement a risk management plan for both electronic and non-electronic information
assets.
Have the privacy official consult on safeguard requirements with the security officer and
others responsible for information practices.
Ensure that security and privacy officials have the authority necessary to implement
effective safeguards.
Have the privacy official create a list of reasonably anticipated threats and hazards to
privacy of protected health information and unauthorized uses or disclosures.
Be aware that many areas of section (g) address specific parts of the safeguards (training,
complaints, sanctions, etc.) and consult those sections for details.

Page 9
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
197
Roadblocks
No roadblocks specific to this point.
Comments
This is an overarching requirement making the covered entity responsible for reasonable privacy
safeguards. The Security regulations and other aspects of the Privacy regulations provide some
of the specifics of what safeguarding entails. Unfortunately, the fact that the final security
regulations have not yet been issued makes it less clear to what safeguard standard the entity will
be held.

Page 10
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
198
PRIV.52
Complaints to the covered entity
§ 164.530(d)(1)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: Complaints to the covered entity. A covered entity must provide a
process for individuals to make complaints concerning the covered entity's
policies and procedures required by this subpart or its compliance with such
policies and procedures or the requirements of this subpart.
(2) Implementation specification: Documentation of complaints. As required by
paragraph (j) of this section, a covered entity must document all complaints
received, and their disposition, if any.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
Covered entities must have a process for receiving and documenting complaints concerning their
privacy policies and procedures. Documentation must note referrals for action, if any.
Key Issues
How will entities publicize complaint procedures to staff and others?
What is the most efficient way to handle complaints-one person or several?
Should a timeframe for handling complaints exist?
Who should be allowed to access complaint information?
Who will investigate and resolve complaints and to whom will this person report
resolution status?
How will this information be maintained, stored, and retrieved? Is there an existing
information system that can be used for complaint maintenance?
How can entities use complaints to evaluate, improve, or change policies and practices?
Will entities use existing complaint processes for information privacy complaints or
develop a different process?
Should this policy be coordinated with the covered entity's Patient Rights policy?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Identify a contact person or office to receive complaints about policies and procedures
and compliance with them.
Maintain a record of complaints and brief explanations of their resolution.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Determine whether the person or office identified to receive complaints will handle them
personally or triage them for handling by others.
Determine timeframes and protocols for handling and reporting complaints.
Use complaints as evaluative and improvement tools where appropriate.
Determine who will access complaint information and for what purposes.
Specify a method to track complaints.
Report periodically on resolutions of complaints.
Coordinate this requirement with the covered entity's Patient Rights policy.

Page 11
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
199
Roadblocks
Operational units within an AMC often address patient complaints directly. Relinquishing this
practice in favor of a single person or central office may challenge cultural norms.
Comments
This is related to PRIV.49

Page 12
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
200
PRIV.53 Sanctions
§ 164.530(e)(1)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: sanctions. A covered entity must have and apply appropriate sanctions
against members of its workforce who fail to comply with the privacy policies and
procedures of the covered entity or the requirements of this subpart. This
standard does not apply to a member of the covered entity's workforce with
respect to actions that are covered by and that meet the conditions of
§ 164.502(j)
or paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
(2) Implementation specification: documentation. As required by paragraph (j) of
this section, a covered entity must document the sanctions that are applied, if any.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
A covered entity must apply and document corrective and disciplinary action when a member of
its workforce fails to comply with the covered entity's policies and procedures related to this
rule.
Key Issues
What sanctions will be applied and when? What gradation will be used?
Who reviews instances of noncompliance and recommends sanctions?
Who is responsible for applying sanctions?
Should physicians have different sanctions?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Develop sanctions against workforce members who fail to comply with the covered
entity's privacy policy.
Charge an individual or group to review policy and procedural violations and specify
corrective and/or disciplinary action.
Apply disciplinary action as necessary and appropriate.
Document corrective and disciplinary action taken.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Make sanctions progressive and commensurate with the severity, frequency, and intent of
violations.
Apply sanctions equitably without regard to an offender's role or position within the
covered entity.
Include termination of employment or contract relationship and/or criminal prosecution
as possible sanctions.
Include provision for sanctions in contract and labor agreements.
Coordinate sanctions with the covered entity's human resources department.
Consider establishing progressive sanctions, such as verbal warning, written warning, up
to termination, and determine when progressive sanctions are appropriate.
Make workforce members aware of the sanction procedures.

Page 13
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
201
Roadblocks
Different discipline standards for various personnel categories may exist.
Comments
Publicizing the use of sanctions may be an effective deterrent to misbehavior. The sanctions do
not apply to whistleblower activities that meet the provisions of § 164.502(j) or complaints,
investigations, or opposition that meet the provisions of § 164.530(g)(2). Business associates are
not included under this particular requirement; requirements for business associates are listed in
§ 164.504.

Page 14
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
202
PRIV.54 Mitigation
§ 164.530(f)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: mitigation. A covered entity must mitigate, to the extent practicable,
any harmful effect that is known to the covered entity of a use or disclosure of
protected health information in violation of its policies and procedures or the
requirements of this subpart by the covered entity or its business associate.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
Covered entities must take positive action to minimize known harmful effects resulting from the
unauthorized use or disclosure of protected health information, and are obligated to correct
known instances of harm. Business associates have an obligation to notify the covered entity of
any harmful effects they know about.
Key Issues
At what point does a harmful effect occur-when protected health information is
inappropriately used or disclosed, or when the inappropriate use or disclosure has a
tangible negative impact?
What reasonable steps should a covered entity should take to mitigate harmful effects?
What does "harmful effect" mean in the covered entity and how does the entity become
aware that one has occurred?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Minimize harmful effects resulting from unauthorized use or disclosure of protected
health information by:
Containing the damage and stopping further compromise; and
Informing those responsible for the policy or procedural breach to prevent future
actions that would have harmful effects.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Consider whether inappropriate use or disclosure may in itself constitute a harmful effect.
(This is a legal issue. See Comments.)
Consider notifying individuals if misuse or inappropriate disclosure of their protected
health information will likely lead to a harmful effect.
Include contract language to transfer the potential financial burden of harm to business
associates.
Roadblocks
The point at which harmful effects occur is debatable. Notifying patients of inappropriate use or
disclosure of protected health information may, at times, cause more grief and consternation than
the direct effects of compromised information.

Page 15
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
203
Comments
The rule uses the term
harmful effect
rather than
harm
. This implies something
following
a cause
or agent, such as a compromise of information. Inappropriate use or disclosure of protected
health information may not be a harmful effect in and of itself.

Page 16
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
204
PRIV.55
Refraining from intimidating or retaliatory acts
§ 164.530(g)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: refraining from intimidating or retaliatory acts. A covered entity may
not intimidate, threaten, coerce, discriminate against, or take other retaliatory
action against:
(1) Individuals. Any individual for the exercise by the individual of any right
under, or for participation by the individual in any process established by this
subpart, including the filing of a complaint under this section;
(2) Individuals and others. Any individual or other person for:
(i) Filing of a complaint with the Secretary under subpart C of part 160 of this
subchapter;
(ii) Testifying, assisting, or participating in an investigation, compliance review,
proceeding, or hearing under Part C of Title XI; or
(iii) Opposing any act or practice made unlawful by this subpart, provided the
individual or person has a good faith belief that the practice opposed is unlawful,
and the manner of the opposition is reasonable and does not involve a disclosure
of protected health information in violation of this subpart.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
Covered entities must not retaliate against persons for filing complaints, for testifying, for
participating in investigations, compliance reviews, proceedings or hearings, or for opposing real
or perceived unlawful acts or practices under this act provided the oppositions are made in good
faith.
Key Issues
Who will determine the proper response, if any?
What will the covered entity do if a workforce member does retaliate?
How can one determine whether retaliation is occurring?
Is there a monitoring or reporting issue here?
How would supervisors know if workforce members are engaged in retaliatory activities?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Establish policies and procedures that prohibit intimidation, threats, coercion,
discrimination, or retaliatory action against individuals who exercise their rights under
this act.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Communicate the non-retaliation policy through related policies and programs (e.g.
Standards of Conduct, Mutual Respect, and/or the Integrity Program).
Consider reporting mechanisms that protect complainers against retaliation (e.g.,
removing complainants' identifying information from complaint reports).
Coordinate with human resources and labor relations representatives.

Page 17
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
205
Roadblocks
Training will be required to help workforce members to understand what is legal and illegal
under HIPAA so that they will correctly recognize illegality outside of their normal scope of
operations.
Comments
Communicating the expectations of this standard is critical.

Page 18
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
206
PRIV.56
Waiver of rights
§ 164.530(h)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: Waiver of rights. A covered entity may not require individuals to waive
their rights under § 160.306 of this subchapter or this subpart as a condition of
the provision of treatment, payment, enrollment in a health plan, or eligibility for
benefits.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
A covered entity may not require individuals to waive their rights to file a complaint or their
other rights under the privacy standards as a condition of treatment, payment, enrollment in a
health plan, or eligibility for benefits. "This subpart" in the regulation text refers to § 164
Subpart E, consisting of §§ 164.500 through 164.534.
Key Issues
Should the entity ask patients to voluntarily waive their rights under this rule?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Do not require individuals to waive their rights to file a complaint or their other rights
under the privacy standards as a condition of treatment, payment, and enrollment in a
health plan or eligibility for benefits.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Consider not putting waivers of rights on consent forms.
Covered entities should not ask patients to waive their privacy rights.
Roadblocks
No roadblocks specific to this point.
Comments
This requirement ensures that covered entities do not force individuals to give up the rights they
have been provided in the privacy standards.

Page 19
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
207
PRIV.57
Policies and procedures
§ 164.530(i)(1)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: policies and procedures. A covered entity must implement policies and
procedures with respect to protected health information that are designed to
comply with the standards, implementation specifications, or other requirements
of this subpart. . The policies and procedures must be reasonably designed,
taking into account the size of and the type of activities that relate to protected
health information undertaken by the covered entity, to ensure such compliance.
This standard is not to be construed to permit or excuse an action that violates
any other standard, implementation specification, or other requirement of this
subpart.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
A covered entity must create and implement its privacy-related policy and procedure set. Merely
having a policy/procedure is not adequate; the design of the policy/procedure set must take into
account the size and type of operations in the covered entity.
Key Issues
How do the size and type of operations affect the policy/procedure set that must be
implemented?
How will the covered entity determine what is reasonable in implementing
policy/procedure?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Implement a reasonable policy/procedure set given the covered entity's size and type of
operations. (Group health plans that operate as described in §164.530(k) need not
conform to this requirement.)
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Formally determine how the covered entity's size and type affect its required
policy/procedure creation and implementation process.
Roadblocks
When smaller entities are absorbed by acquisition or merger into larger ones (e.g., an AMC
buying a community hospital), the policy/procedure set of the previously small covered entity
may not be adequate for its new role as part of the larger covered entity.
Comments
See GEN.06.

Page 20
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
208
PRIV.58
Changes to policies or procedures
§ 164.530(i)(2)
HIPAA Requirement
Standard: changes to policies or procedures. (i) A covered entity must change its
policies and procedures as necessary and appropriate to comply with changes in
the law, including the standards, requirements, and implementation specifications
of this subpart;
(ii) When a covered entity changes a privacy practice that is stated in the notice
described in
§ 164.520
, and makes corresponding changes to its policies and
procedures, it may make the changes effective for protected health information
that it created or received prior to the effective date of the notice revision, if the
covered entity has, in accordance with
§ 164.520(b)(
1)(v)(C), included in the
notice a statement reserving its right to make such a change in its privacy
practices; or
(iii) A covered entity may make any other changes to policies and procedures at
any time, provided that the changes are documented and implemented in
accordance with paragraph (i)(5) of this section.
(3) Implementation specification: changes in law. Whenever there is a change in
law that necessitates a change to the covered entity's policies or procedures, the
covered entity must promptly document and implement the revised policy or
procedure. If the change in law materially affects the content of the notice
required by § 164.520, the covered entity must promptly make the appropriate
revisions to the notice in accordance with § 164.520(b)(3). Nothing in this
paragraph may be used by a covered entity to excuse a failure to comply with the
law.
(4) Implementation specifications: changes to privacy practices stated in the
notice. (i) To implement a change as provided by paragraph (i)(2)(ii) of this
section, a covered entity must:
(A) Ensure that the policy or procedure, as revised to reflect a change in the
covered entity's privacy practice as stated in its notice, complies with the
standards, requirements, and implementation specifications of this subpart;
(B) Document the policy or procedure, as revised, as required by paragraph (j) of
this section; and
(C) Revise the notice as required by § 164.520(b)(3) to state the changed practice
and make the revised notice available as required by § 164.520(c). The covered
entity may not implement a change to a policy or procedure prior to the effective
date of the revised notice.
(ii) If a covered entity has not reserved its right under § 164.520(b)(1)(v)(C) to
change a privacy practice that is stated in the notice, the covered entity is bound
by the privacy practices as stated in the notice with respect to protected health
information created or received while such notice is in effect. A covered entity
may change a privacy practice that is stated in the notice, and the related policies
and procedures, without having reserved the right to do so, provided that:
(A) Such change meets the implementation the requirements in paragraphs
(i)(4)(i)(A)-(C) of this section; and

Page 21
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
209
(B) Such change is effective only with respect to protected health information
created or received after the effective date of the notice.
(5) Implementation specification: changes to other policies or procedures. A
covered entity may change, at any time, a policy or procedure that does not
materially affect the content of the notice required by § 164.520, provided that:
(i) The policy or procedure, as revised, complies with the standards,
requirements, and implementation specifications of this subpart; and
(ii) Prior to the effective date of the change, the policy or procedure, as revised, is
documented as required by paragraph (j) of this section.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
When a change in law affects a covered entity's privacy policy, the policy must change to
accommodate the change in law. If the covered entity reserved the right to change its privacy
policies and procedures in its privacy notice, it may apply the new standards to protected health
information acquired before the change. If it did not, it must continue to apply the old standard
to that information. Entities must maintain documentation of their policies and procedures. Note
that group health plans are excepted from this requirement (§ 164.530(i)) if they handle little
protected health information as described in § 164.530(k).
Key Issues
What are the implications on operations of not reserving the right to change policy in the
privacy notice, changing it, and then having prior protected health information governed
by the old notice and new governed by the new notice?
How will the covered entity determine what is reasonable in implementing
policy/procedure change?
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these
Change policies and procedures when changes to law or regulations require it.
If the privacy notice provides for changes, change it when policies that affect it change.
The new notice will either cover all protected health information, or only new
information, depending on whether the prior notice reserved the right to change.
Document the policy and procedure change process, either in writing or electronically.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these
Consider reserving the right to change privacy policy in the privacy notice.
Consider the logistics and communications issues of changes when crafting privacy
policies and notices-to employees as well as patients.
Determine how covered entity size, complexity, and type affect the policy/procedure
creation and implementation process.
Roadblocks
When smaller entities are absorbed by acquisition or merger into larger ones (e.g., an AMC
buying a community hospital), the policy/procedure set of the previously small covered entity
may not be adequate for its new role as part of the large covered entity.

Page 22
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
210
Comments.
Group health plans that operate as described in § 164.530(k) need not conform to this
requirement.

Page 23
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
211
PRIV.59 Documentation
§
164.530(j)
HIPAA Requirement
(1) Standard: Documentation. A covered entity must:
(i) Maintain the policies and procedures provided for in paragraph (i) of this
section in written or electronic form;
(ii) If a communication is required by this subpart to be in writing, maintain such
writing, or an electronic copy, as documentation; and
(iii) If an action, activity, or designation is required by this subpart to be
documented, maintain a written or electronic record of such action, activity, or
designation.
(2) Implementation specification: Retention period. A covered entity must retain
the documentation required by paragraph (j)(1) of this section for six years from
the date of its creation or the date when it last was in effect, whichever is later.
AMC Explanation of HIPAA Regulation
This requirement calls for documentation in support of policies and procedures and all other
subparts of the privacy regulations that directly list documentation as a requirement.
Documentation must be kept current to reflect changes in regulatory requirements and a covered
entity's privacy processes, and must be retained for a period of 6 years. It appears that the
provisions of this section apply to all of the other documentation requirements of the regulation.
Key Issues
How will the entity ensure compliance with document management requirements?
How will the entity ensure consistent documentation practices across departments?
Who will be allowed to have access to this documentation.
Category I Guidelines-Actions must be taken to address these.
Document privacy policies and procedures in written or electronic form.
Document required communications, designations, actions, and activities.
Record date of creation and last date of effectiveness of documents.
Maintain required documentation for six years from date of creation or the date when the
policy or procedure was last in effect, whichever is later.
Category II Guidelines-Actions should be taken to address these.
Promulgate the policy on documentation from the highest organizational level.
Clearly delineate responsibility for documentation of policies and procedures.
Specify the rescission and review dates for documentation.
Centralize retention of policy and procedure documentation.
Communicate to managers that a lack of documentation may be interpreted as failure of
compliance.
Organize documentation in such a way that it can be identified when necessary.
Centralize and standardize documentation across the organization so that it is easily
accessible.

Page 24
AMC/HIPAA Workgroup
212
Roadblocks
It may be difficult to get some groups within the entity to adopt required documentation practices
and procedures. Without direction and accountability for the periodic review and
communication of documentation updates, it is easy for documentation to fall by the wayside.
Comments
Several other standards also require documentation of policy and procedure, as well as
documentation of consideration given to policies that might not be adopted. Among those are
standards associated with JCAHO, the FDA Safe Medical Device Act, OSHA, and others.
Document management could involve a central office, or could be the responsibility of each
manager.